Skip to content

Choosing the right Python package to extract content from source documents

Different source document formats require different Python parsing libraries to extract usable text before chunking and embedding for a RAG pipeline. Choosing the right package depends on the file type (PDF, HTML, DOCX, PPTX, etc.) and the structure of content you need to preserve, such as tables, layout, or metadata.

1 · Learn the must-know

  • For PDFs, common extraction libraries include PyPDF2/pypdf, pdfplumber, and unstructured, with unstructured and pdfplumber generally better at preserving tables and layout.
  • For HTML content, BeautifulSoup (bs4) is the standard choice for parsing tags and extracting clean text while stripping markup.
  • For Microsoft Office formats, python-docx handles Word documents and python-pptx handles PowerPoint files, extracting text and structural elements natively.
  • The unstructured library is a general-purpose option that can handle multiple formats (PDF, HTML, DOCX, images, etc.) with a consistent API, useful when source data is heterogeneous.
  • Scanned or image-based PDFs require OCR (e.g., via pytesseract) since text-extraction libraries cannot read non-selectable text.
  • Always match the extraction library to the need to retain structure (tables, headers) versus simple plain-text extraction, since over-simplifying can degrade downstream RAG answer quality.

2 · Check your understanding

Check this objectiveFree · always available

The data engineering team exported an internal Confluence space as a set of static .html files for a support-bot RAG pipeline. Each page's useful content sits inside a specific div with class 'page-body', while navigation menus and footers must be discarded. The team needs to target that div by tag and class before chunking. Which package should they use?

Your objective map0 tried · 0 answered correctly · 56 untouched

What you have tried across Databricks GenAI Engineer's objectives, not a readiness score.

Design Applications10.71% of the exam*0 of 6 tried
Data Preparation14.29% of the exam*0 of 8 tried
Application Development23.21% of the exam*0 of 13 tried
Assembling and Deploying Applications26.79% of the exam*0 of 15 tried
Governance7.14% of the exam*0 of 4 tried
Evaluation and Monitoring17.86% of the exam*0 of 10 tried

* Our estimate. Databricks publishes no section weights.

3 · Keep going