Dealing with duplicate rows, gaps, and data that arrives late
Real-world data pipelines in Microsoft Fabric must account for duplicates, nulls, and data that arrives after its expected processing window. Fabric provides tools across Dataflow Gen2, pipelines, and Spark notebooks to detect and remediate these quality issues before data lands in the lakehouse or warehouse. Choosing the right technique (dedup keys, watermarking, imputation) depends on the ingestion pattern (batch vs. streaming) and downstream analytical requirements.
Must-know
- Deduplication can be handled in Dataflow Gen2 using the 'Remove Duplicates' transformation, or in Spark/SQL using dropDuplicates(),
ROW_NUMBER() window functions, or MERGE/upsert logic on a business key to avoid inserting repeated rows. - Missing values can be handled via Dataflow Gen2's 'Fill Down/Fill Up' and 'Replace Values' transforms, or in Spark using fillna(), dropna(), or conditional imputation logic, depending on whether nulls should be defaulted, interpolated, or excluded.
- Late-arriving data in streaming scenarios (e.g., Eventstream or Spark Structured Streaming) is managed using watermarking, which defines how long the engine waits for delayed events before finalizing a windowed aggregation, trading completeness for latency.
- For batch pipelines, late-arriving dimension or fact records are typically handled with upsert/MERGE patterns keyed on business/natural keys plus a last-modified or ingestion timestamp, ensuring late updates overwrite or supplement existing lakehouse/warehouse rows rather than duplicating them.
- Delta Lake tables (the default table format in Fabric Lakehouse) natively support MERGE INTO, which is the standard mechanism for idempotently applying inserts/updates/deletes when reprocessing or handling late/duplicate data.
- A common gotcha: deduplication logic must define which record is 'correct' when duplicates exist (e.g., latest by timestamp) since simple distinct/removal without ordering can silently drop the wrong row.
An engineer builds a Fabric Dataflow Gen2 that ingests daily sales files from a data lake folder into a lakehouse table. Upstream systems occasionally reprocess a file, causing the same rows to appear more than once in the combined dataset. The dataflow must output a table with no duplicate rows. Which query step should the engineer add before loading the data?
What you have tried across DP-700's objectives, not a readiness score.
Implement and manage an analytics solution
- Tuning a workspace's Spark compute defaults and pool sizing
- Grouping and governing workspaces with a Fabric domain
- Setting per-workspace defaults for OneLake storage
- Standing up an Airflow job runtime inside a workspace
- Connecting a workspace to a Git repository
- Managing schema changes with a database project
- Promoting Fabric items across environments with a deployment pipeline
- Granting and restricting access at the workspace level
- Locking down who can open a single Fabric item
- Layering row, column, object, and file-level security rules
- Hiding sensitive column values behind a dynamic mask
- Classifying Fabric items with a sensitivity label
- Marking a trusted item as promoted or certified
- Reading a Fabric audit log to see who did what
- Securing data at the OneLake storage layer
- Picking the right build tool among a dataflow, a pipeline, and a notebook
- Kicking off a job on a schedule or in response to an event
- Chaining notebooks and pipelines together with parameters and dynamic expressions
Ingest and transform data
- Deciding between a full reload and an incremental load
- Shaping source data ahead of a dimensional-model load
- Landing a continuous stream of data into storage
- Matching a workload to the right Fabric data store
- Picking a transformation tool from dataflows, notebooks, KQL, or T-SQL
- Linking to external data without copying it via a OneLake shortcut
- Keeping a source database continuously replicated into Fabric
- Moving data into Fabric with a data pipeline
- Writing transform logic in PySpark, SQL, or KQL
- Flattening related tables into one wide, denormalized shape
- Rolling records up with group-by aggregations
- Dealing with duplicate rows, gaps, and data that arrives late
- Selecting the right engine for a real-time workload
- Weighing storage-in-place against a linked shortcut for a Real-Time Intelligence table
- Weighing an accelerated shortcut against a standard one for query speed
- Routing and reshaping live events with an Eventstream
- Handling a continuous flow of records with Spark's structured streaming
- Querying and reshaping event data with KQL
- Aggregating a stream over sliding or tumbling time windows
Monitor and optimize an analytics solution
- Watching an ingestion job's health and progress
- Watching a transformation job's health and progress
- Tracking whether a semantic model's refresh actually succeeded
- Setting up an alert to catch a failure early
- Tracking down why a pipeline run failed and fixing it
- Diagnosing why a dataflow run failed
- Debugging a notebook run that failed
- Troubleshooting a misbehaving Eventhouse
- Troubleshooting a misbehaving Eventstream
- Debugging a T-SQL statement that failed
- Fixing a broken or unreachable shortcut
- Speeding up a Lakehouse table with maintenance operations
- Making a slow pipeline run faster
- Tuning a Fabric warehouse for faster queries
- Improving throughput on real-time streaming components
- Tuning a Spark job to run faster and cheaper
- Making a slow query run faster
Coverage checked against the published exam guide on Aug 11, 2026.
These are independent practice questions, written against this certification's published exam guide. They are not the certification vendor's own questions, and not the real exam.